Sriram Raghavan did a great job with Johnny Gaddaar. In fact a few days after I saw Ek Haseena Thi (Raghavan's first film), I was pretty sad wondering if the guy would ever get a chance to make a second movie. I loved Ek Haseena Thi but it did not do well at the box office. That did surprise me but ah ! well ! I was very impressed with the intelligent script and Saif's good looks. I loved the ending.Coming to Johnny Gaddaar (JG), first a taste of the story line and then my analysis. The film revolves around a gang of five men, from different age groups, with different occupations and spectacularly different characteristics. What brought them together was a desire to make more money, easy money. "Easy" is the wrong word. Quick money. The movie starts with all of them putting in money together to invest in a deal. The movie really starts when one of them decides to steal the money before the money reaches the dealer. How does he do it ? HE (am not disclosing) plans something but things do not go according to his plan. Be it unintended murders, slip of tongue, instant decisions, irresponsible lying - the audience will never be able to guess what is there on HIS mind. Sometimes HE does not know it himself. A very careful sense of humor rendered by Dharamji as also Vinay Pathak; degrees of romance, be it between Vikram and his girl friend, between Dharamaji and his late wife, OR the absence of romance in Ashwini Kalsekar's marital life, with his wife cheating on him; a sufficient number of bar dancers (quite hot looking girls) and just the right amount of blood shedding - the movie is a complete paisa and time wasool. I add the "time" part of it because it cost me nothing to see the movie. That is another story.
So the movie is awesome. No one can get bored, partly because you will always labour to anticipate what will happen next and you will not know it (unless you are watching it the second time) and so you will keep labouring even harder. In all this exercise you will forget about getting bored. If you are a Hindi film buff this is just the movie. It has the essential bits that will contribute to its success. Reference to Hindi blockbusters is a great technique. Even You've Got Mail had frequent reference to Godfather and it worked well. A scene from JG will, rather should remind you of Anand's last scene. There were too many....
Performances are good. Dharamji is quite good in the film, specially after his horrible performance in Life in a Metro ( WHY did he and Nafisa have to be in that movie? That movie was good for the most part but I can never appreciate plagiarism. The main story in the movie was a scene by scene lift from the Academy Award wining film The Apartment . 1950s. Mr Director must have thought no one would have seen that movie. ) Dharam Paaji needed this film. Vinay Pathak and Ashwini Kalsekar are good actors. Vikram, the introducing-so-and-so guy, was OK. He will not make it big, though. He does not have too many expressions. He can do reasonably good butt works but unless he is playing a gay or a transvestite in his next film, which seems like a remote possibility, he has little chance. He played this role alright.
The execution of the movie is superb. Like Forrest Gump (feather blowing in the wind) and some more films the movie starts and ends with the same scenes. In the context of JG, it showed the triviality of the story told and yet magnetic quality it had. It did not end on some great note (surprise note, YES) but the entire stretch was so good, 'the coming of the police' did not have to happen in the end. The movie also reminded me of True Romance ( a must watch film for people who are serious about cinema). No sneaky lift there. Adequate in its doses of love scenes, the plot of both the movies intertwines itself around the leading couple but ends as if it did not matter. The script is quite authoritarian. It does not answer all questions. By the end the audience is prepared to be led.
Movies such as this and Bheja Fry in combination with movies such as Chak De India appeal to me as conforming that we are almost into the Golden Age of Bollywood. How long shall we keep repeating borrowed intellectual lines like " the lyrics of yester-years were amazing...lyrics today make no sense." We need to have movies that run because of the script mainly, without big stars. We also need to see King Khan once in a while. Even better if he is not crying and instead leading a team of bright, witty, women hockey players. WATCH JG.
11 comments:
Dear sis...an interetsing post..I sure WILL watch JG...Your report is very intense n compelling..fantastic i must say..better than nikhit azmi a lot of places!!!However u`ll be sad to know that even parts of Chak de is copy-ed from english movies like miracle..etc etc..(Gosh!! Why??)Unlike u- a few days back i just felt "when will there be a golden age in bollywood"?? watching movies like mad these days made me realise non-bollywood movies are more often than not "good"..the opposite being true for bollywood!! It aches my heart to see that in bollywood it seems like making movies is like making "easy n quick money" (some plagiarism here..he he), where very few movies imitate/draw inspiration from real life n vice versa. Unlike tat, in hollywood for example, I`ve often found tremendous hard work,research, originality,etc for even the wierdest of movies...I would say, more than the infrastructure, its the zeal to take movie-making seriously as an art is what gives them the edge..We maybe better than our neighbours (u remembr the bangladesh copy of "dil" v saw in mamabari ? ;))) but I`m sure even you`re infuriated at the thought of movies like asoka,paheli(& what not!)being sent at the oscars?? We can do a lot, lot better? what do you say??
What is 'Hindu' film buff!?
Thanks Mugdha..Will reply soon.
Anonymous - It was a typo. Corrected now. Thanks. Keep visiting.
Hi Dharitri,
I do completely agree with what you said about JG. I have watched it myself and loved it too.
But I must point it out that you should not put bheja fry, JG and Chak De in the same category. Especially because bheja fry is a scene by scene copy from this French movie Dinner Game. And once you have watched Dinner game (I recommend it), you will not enjoy BF as much. :)
Sayantani
Actually, I do know now about Bheja Fry and it makes me so sad...Partner too is a scene by scene copy of HITCH...Why do actors even act in these movies ? Well that was a rhetorical question..
Thanks Sayantani.
Mugdha, I think I do agree with you that most Hollywood films that I have seen reflect great earnestness and research. Even if they are not great works of art there still remains some scope for appreciation.
There is also one more thing that struck me about Hollywood films and that is the number of films portraying famous Americans. Films such as Walk the Line (Johnny Cash), Ray (Ray Charles), Beyond The Sky (Bobby Darin), Raging Bull (Jake LaMotta), Cinderella Man (Jim Braddock)and of course Pursuit of Happyness (Christopher Paul Gardener)have seen brilliant actors and directors, all involved in presenting to the audience Americans who rose above all else. For a fact I know that there have been such Indians as well but there is hardly a film that can parallel the biographical films genre in Hollywood. The only one that comes to my mind is Rituporno Ghosh's Dohon. I am not talking about films like GURU which ALMOST seems to be a portrayal of Ambani.
What I do not understand is that is this supposed to be a comedy movie or an action thriller? Or a uneqaul mixture of both?
JG is a wonderful movie.
deepak, do not worry about the genre. However, the genre may be termed as film noir.I have not seen this kind of movie in recent times.
However, bheja fry is a not so good copy of the french movie dinner game. It is indianised a bit, though. In an industry, where almost anyone and everyone can be pointed out for copying, this is not much. Plus, it is impressive that they are trying something other than english movies..:P.
( although, this seems to be general trend right now. Remember Zinda from korean OLD BOY? even, OSO picked one famous line from Paulo Coelho's Alchemist! Did not expect that, to be very frank.)
Coming back to JG. Sound tracks are equally impressive. References to old bollywood movies like Anand, Bandini and Parwana are very well plotted. Kudos, Sriram.
However, I am really skeptical about "the golden age of Bollywood".
I did not read the full post but I agree that it is an exceptionally good film. I just didn't find the justification of including Dharmendra. He seemed like a misfit ... did they go for an actor who would portray a character who is a criminal but looks like a nice ordinary guy? If thats the logic then its OK ... otherwise ... and the main guy ... overall very bland and expressionless ... anyway ... deserves a standing applause ... great movie ...
I finally watched this movie and have to say it was unexpectedly good. It seemed like a low-budget movie but was definitely worth it.
Post a Comment